qrcode

Wednesday, September 07, 2005

A Rose By Any Other Name Is Just As Thorny

In my morning paper, I read that refugees from the storm don't much like the word "refugees" as the story linked to the title of this blog suggests. The problem is that the word is taken by at least some of these Katrina victims as having a negative implication. Are they being oversensitive? In my experience, many if not most White people will say they are. All you have to do to see that this might be so is consult the sports message boards on the issue of whether our universities should use Indian names and logos as accouterments for their sports teams. White people in my experience feel qualified to say what is and isn't insulting to minorities in this country.

Interestingly, I also found this morning a BBC News item bearing on this issue.

In every age, schoolchildren have an armoury of words most calculated to hurt and humiliate each other.

The words change from generation to generation, but one thing usually stays the same: adults shudder with shame at the words they used as children.

Learning difficulties, cerebral palsy, Romanies: all terms now used respectfully where once euphemisms were abuse.

And now, it seems, playgrounds up and down the country are resounding with the latest taunt: Refugee.
So, it seems that some of our British brethren see the word the same way.

One thing is for sure, the word "refugee" has no good connotations. I have never heard anyone say anything like I yearn to be a refugee. In the story linked through the Title of this blog, we find

For some, the word "refugee" is loaded with racial undertones, conveys too sorry a fate for the victims, or simply doesn't, in its dictionary definition, apply. For others, there's just no better way to describe the horrific condition of the hurricane victims.
There would be an excellent reason for seeing "refugee" is racial terms in the New Orleans circumstance: one rarely saw a White face amongst the persons evacuated to the Superdome and Convention Center. Some 67% of the New Orleans citizenry were Black and many if not most were poor. I suspect that New Orleans was as bad as any city in the country in this respect and this is ironic in a way for the fame of this city rests more on on the musical contributions of African-Americans in the form of jazz than any other single thing, with the free flowing booze being second. To gourmands, its food is a reason to visit. .

I am not sure how these Americans who have been put out of their homes by Katrina should be referred to but I am quite sure that it shouldn't be up to me or any other White person. It is clear that "refugees" is a very bad choice on either side of the Atlantic. I would suggest that they not be referred to as "homeless." That would be a step in the wrong direction. "Displaced persons" has some left over negative connotations from WW II to some of us older people. There may not be a good term, primarily because their circumstance is so bad.

President Bush is cited in as saying

"The people we're talking about are not refugees," the president said, according to the Associated Press. "They are Americans, and they need the help and love and compassion of our fellow citizens."
I am pleased to read of this. Actually, to be honest, I am a little shocked.

Tweet This!

27 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just thought I would visit and ask if you might be interested in the Blog Submitter. If so stop by. Thanks!

Blogger Boys

10:19 AM

 
Anonymous Richard Hershberger said...

I find the whole discussion of "refugee" curious. At worst, the word is undergoing a semantic shift, not yet adopted by everyone. No one, after all, would suggest that Woody Guthrie was denigrating persons from Oklahoma when he wrote "Dust Bowl Refugees" or that race had anything to do with it.

So the best case is that the word is narrowing in meaning, with the current situation not falling within the narrower sense, and eventually everyone will catch up. Another possibility is that the negative connotations are attached to the situation, not the word, and that these connotations will accordingly attach themselves to whatever word replaces "refugee". Then we end up with another absurd endlessly changing string of new euphemisms.

The the invocation of race is especially strange. Yes, the people in question are disproportionately non-white, and that is a tragedy that cries out in its own right. But race is incidental to the situation of being forced to abandon one's home. Would we be using a word other than "refugee" were the people in question white? I doubt it. "Refugee" has been used because that it is matter-of-fact obvious word.

Finally we come to the idea that non-white people can dictate the language regardless of circumstances: If I pack a lunch and eat it outside, I call that a "picnic". I really don't care about any Just So stories anyone makes up about the word.

10:52 AM

 
Blogger Language Guy said...

Richard, I think the denotation of "refugee" has remained constant through my life, which goes back to WW II. Whatever secondary significances it may have will vary with circumstances as you say. After WW II, there were many different kinds of people who were refugees, many of whom were Jewish or Slavic. After the Vietnam war, they were Vietnamese.
Right now, there are many Whites who have been dislocated (e. g., a Biloxi cousin of mine, her husband, daughter, son-in-law, and son) often had the resources to go to friends or relatives they could stay after her house was obliterated. My cousin and her family had a functional car (not sure how that happened exactly) and had offers from people in Texas, Alabama, Oklahoma, and Ohio at a minimum, and since the daughter's home survived they all have a place to return to in Biloxi when essential services return. It was the poor, who are mostly Black, who got stuck where they were in New Orleans and they will surely dominate the rolls of the dead and the rolls of those who are displaced from their homes. The secondary significance in which "refugee" has picked up the color "Black" in the USA is due entirely, I suspect, to the TV images we have all seen. The people shown have been primarily Black. In ten years, I suspect we will see refugees differently. But the denotation will stay the same.

7:58 AM

 
Anonymous Alex said...

Do you mind if I digress from your interesting post on the evolution of language for a moment? I have a question for you. Which is correct in your opinion? 'Friendlier' or 'more friendly'?
'Friendliest' or 'most friendly'?

I would love to hear your opinion.

All the best,

Alex from Blog from Italy

8:35 AM

 
Blogger Language Guy said...

If you are just asking me which I think I say, it would be the +ier and +iest forms. Bisyllabic words tend to go that way. Trisyllabic words normally require "more/less" and "mostleast." "Beautifuler" is a mess.

"Yellower" seems fine. Not fond of "This is more yellow than that."

English is, however, a morphological mess so expect some exceptions. In fact, there is a general rule of thumb in linguistics that if a rule has exceptions it is a rule dealing with word structure. In general the real syntactic rules, as opposed to the ones English teachers press on students, do not have exceptions.

So, there is a rule in English that says that a noun phrase or prepositional phrase (almost the same things) containing or comprised of a "wh" form (which, what, how, when, etc.) can be "extracted" from subordinate clauses. I have put an X where the extraction site is in this sentence:
"Who did the man say (X ate the whole pie)?"
However the "extraction site" cannot occur within a clause that modifies a noun phrase (to make things simple). The following sentence is way bad.
*Who did the man (who married X) really loved Sue." Compare with
"The man (who married Sally) really loved Sue."

9:03 AM

 
Blogger Alex said...

Thanks for your response.

I was interested in both what you say and what the books state - which is that -ier -est are correct. I raised this question as a result of a comment on my blog which had been left by one of my Italian readers. She stated that she had observed the useage of both the traditional comparative superlative forms and the use of more, most friendly, and this got me thinking, as I fear that I may have been guilty of using the more/most version. Oops. However, more/most friendly does not 'feel' bad to me, whereas 'beautifuler' 'feels' awkward and I would never use it. I often trust my instinct with regard to the correct useage of words and formation of sentences and it is more often than not correct - the influence of my mother I suspect - a stickler for good grammar.

I wondered whether the use of more/most friendly was something done in US English, but it seems that this is not the case.

As for subordinate clause structures, again, with enough knowledge of English (or any language) you can 'feel' that 'Who did the man (who married X) really loved Sue.' is clearly wrong and it does not make any sense. The 'who' in actual fact refers to the object of loved ie 'Sue', and thus cannot be mentioned in question.

I must think about this some more and I need to understand more just why certain combinations can or cannot go together. I don't do enough sentence analysis, although, as I stated before I understand when a sentence is intrinsically right or wrong.

If you'd like to put my instinct to the test, please feel free!

10:13 AM

 
Blogger Mark said...

Maybe I didn't pick this up but I am assuming that you are living in a country and speaking the language as a native. I feel that you truly learn how you use your own language when you choose to do so in a culture outwith your own. Even something as simple (and black and white) as "yes" and "no" in response to a seemingly direct question can be difficult to fathom - i.e. does the respondent actually agree or disagree with you. For example, linving in Thailand I may ask a local the following question "You don't play chess do you?" to which they may respond "no". As a native English speaker, I have found that I invariably misunderstand their responses and the fault is entirely down to my mal-usage of my own language. It's frightening when they can barely string a sentence together but their grammar is better than mine.

Enjoyed your posts...

regards

Mark

1:39 PM

 
Blogger Dortch McGirken said...

How about calling the morons? Or how about ticks? Most (not all) of them were sucking blood from the dog known as tax payers, then when that portion of the dog got wet, they are simply gonna find a dry spot on that same dog and suck sucking blood out of it again. I guess it is hard to buy a car when you decide to have four or five kids before you turn thirty. And you do DECIDE to have them, they don't just happen.

In the beginning I admit I got caught up in the media frenzy.. Ten thousand dead.. Murdering, drug abusing thugs armed and roaming the streets shooting at everything in sight. We all know know how over-stated these stories where. The dead have not even reached one thousand. But of course it had to turn into racial crap. It will always be racial crap.

And as a human being, I feel qualified to pretty much say anything I want. I also feel free to hate to my hearts content. When we start making emotions illegal.. Well, with hate crimes we are well on our way.

I have always wondered though, what would cause a hole in the ozone faster, my spray can, or a giant rocket ship blasting through it with thrusters ablaze? Another reason I really do not believe in global warming.. Hurricanes have been around since before recorded history. Hopefully they we still be around long after we are all gone. Could you imagine back in the olden days when a hurricane could hit you and you had absolutley no way of knowing there was even a storm near?

8:02 AM

 
Blogger Jeniffer Just said...

The people who mind being called refugees may be hyper-sensitive. But it would be no "surprise", if they were, considering the unfamilliar events they are going through, having lost their home. It's a very emotional time and words, can be used to harm and they can triggure emotional baggage that may or may not be resolved. It's hard to resolve one's emotional conflicts when one's society is moving too fast, which it often does.

When George Bush says that they are not refugees, they are americans, he's playing on trying to fill the need to belong and be loved, with national identity. I hope he went it to, though I doubt it, a discourse on labels and names and how they can harm people.
I'm not surprised in some way that humans are calling others refugees, when they are not quite that. Just as president bush calls terrorists terrorsits when they are not just that.
But as long as we are americans.... God knows..


come see my site please...

8:50 AM

 
Blogger VenusNewYork said...

Look up the word refugee then you'll understand that there are no hyper-sensitivity issues going on for anyone evacuated from their homes during the recent Katrina Fear relief. Many of us see the use of the word refugee as political. The word indicates that the person is no longer a member of their mother country, that they were forced out. This is not a white or black issue. Does anyone think about white or black skin color when it comes to Tsunami or Kosovo refugees? The media wants to put race, 'not a citizen', hey look this was as bad as tsunami, a natural disaster, in to the huge clutter of presidential irresponsibility. p.s. There were white people who died in New Orleans and who were also evacuated from their homes in other parts of the country. They too were renamed 'refugees'.

7:58 PM

 
Blogger gring01 said...

The #1 Selling Internetmarketing Software In The World blog Submitter ...Accused Of Using Secret Intelligence To Optimize Your Website Rankings Fast.

6:58 PM

 
Blogger Steve Austin said...

Enjoyable blog. Please check out my hot dog blog.

3:58 AM

 
Blogger musica said...

Great blog it really nice. To learn more about blogger visit
blog submitter The best blog submitter

12:18 PM

 
Blogger musica said...

Great blog it really nice. To learn more about blogger visit
search engine position The best search engine position

12:44 PM

 
Blogger kalisekj said...

Cool Blog, I never really thought about it that way.

I have a Hurricane Katrina blog. It pretty much covers hurricane related stuff.

Thank you - and keep up the thoughts!

6:54 PM

 
Blogger musica said...

Great blog it really nice. To learn more about blogger visit
blog The best blog

10:16 AM

 
Blogger Jason said...

Your blog is briliant! Keep it up. Here'e something for you if your looking for some free advertising:free newspaper advertising
Check it out for some great free newspaper advertising solutions.

2:38 PM

 
Blogger musica said...

Great blog it really nice. To learn more about blogger visit
search engine position The best search engine position

10:31 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm sorry but I must say: Does it matter?? They lost everything and that's it, either if they're being refered as refugee or homeless or whatever does not going to change that fact.

8:28 PM

 
Blogger musica said...

Great blog it really nice. To learn more about blogger visit
search engine positioning The best search engine positioning

11:35 PM

 
Blogger musica said...

Great blog it really nice. To learn more about blogger visit
search engine positioning The best search engine positioning

9:56 AM

 
Blogger musica said...

Great blog it really nice. To learn more about blogger visit
search engine positioning The best search engine positioning

12:01 PM

 
Blogger musica said...

Great blog it really nice. To learn more about blogger visit
blog submitter The best blog submitter

1:40 PM

 
Blogger Nykki said...

Thanks for posting this! I felt as if I were disrespecting the Americans who had to leave parts of Louisiana because of the storm, victims or refugees. I see both of those words as negative and untrue of the circumstances. I see the meaning of those words as a person who has over come situations because they had no choice in the matter but to over come them. Now I may seem a bit rude by saying if a person lives in a place where the chances of devastation happens and decide to stay you are not a victim or refugee but instead a willing participant. Your post help give me a different view.

3:30 PM

 
Blogger musica said...

Great blog it really nice. To learn more about blogger visit
search engine positioning The best search engine positioning

6:52 PM

 
Anonymous Mike said...

Very interesting aspects about life and politics.

4:07 PM

 
Blogger Le vent fripon said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

11:56 AM

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home